340 or 440-6

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [1970-1974 Challenger Modifications] >> Appearance >> 340 or 440-6 Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
340 or 440-6 - 4/17/2007 5:34:10 PM   
lear4406

 

Posts: 1145
Joined: 9/25/2006
Status: offline
I will have to make up my mind soon. I have the 340 in the Challenger now. It runs good and has about 350 HP. But I have a 1978 440 motor in my 70 GTX that I'm pulling out to put in a 70 440-4 bbl. I want to be close to stock appearing as possible. I will be using a Keisler 5-speed and need to make up my mind to use the 440-6pak or stay with the 340. I will be driving it a good bit so I thought that the 340 would be better on gas. But for wow factor the 440-6 would be better. The 440 has some mods done to it and it will be freshened up if I use it. I like the idea of a six pak motor,but I want to drive the car also. What do you guys think. 340 or 440.

_____________________________

Post #: 1
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 4/17/2007 5:49:32 PM   
RLSH700

 

Posts: 3855
Joined: 1/19/2006
Status: offline
Depends. What output is the 440? Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't a 1978 440 have lower output. If it has around 390hp as the 6 barrel 440 had, it would be very tempting, if not keep the 340. A 340 is easy to modify and as Patrick has explain it can rival big blocks due to its light weight. The handling would be better with the 340. The insurance would probably be lower with the 340. The 340 is the more practical approach, the 440 is the more wow factor approach. It depends on what you value more between the two.

_____________________________

"To Debate and Moderate" since 2006

College Graduate:
B.S. in Marketing
A.A. in nothing

The first 426 Dual Quad member.
The first to 2000 posts


(in reply to lear4406)
Post #: 2
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 4/17/2007 7:40:46 PM   
kps2167

 

Posts: 3
Joined: 3/14/2007
Status: offline
kps2167's photo gallery
The big thing now is stroker motors. You can buy a 408 stroker kit for the 340. The wow factor is tons of HP in a little bitty package and lite on weight. If you want I candy then the big motor (440) with a six pack is the why to go. I have been think about making a 340 stroker motor but install small block Hemi heads. It would be a 408 Hemi. You get the HP and the eye candy all at the same time. Try this links http://www.rodandcustommachines.com/smallblockhemiheads.html
What do you think?

(in reply to lear4406)
Post #: 3
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 4/17/2007 7:40:55 PM   
jdb840


Posts: 265
Joined: 11/8/2006
Status: offline
jdb840's photo gallery
Being I've never rode in a 340, my answer is to go with the 440 6pack. In 74 and later they raised the compression the 440motors, which doesn't to me mean to much. It still has great potential, and with the right parts can easily be made into a beast.
You will definiatly get alot more reaction with the 440-6. I get more people asking to see the motor, even though it's clearly marked asking does it actually have a 440-6 in it. Even when i had a 440 charger, this gets way more attention.

_____________________________


(in reply to RLSH700)
Post #: 4
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 4/17/2007 11:25:43 PM   
mopar440


Posts: 61
Joined: 3/8/2007
Status: offline
My suggestion is to keep the 340 in the Challenger and put the 440+6 in the GTX. The 78 440 is a motorhome motor, it is thin walled compared to the thicker walled 440's that were built 73 and before. The 340 will rev higher than the 440 will, even though the 440 puts out more torque off the line. Unless you rebuilt the 78 440, it has a cast crank and not a forged crank like the 70 440+6. For power purposes, forged is way better than cast.

< Message edited by mopar440 -- 4/17/2007 11:31:34 PM >

(in reply to jdb840)
Post #: 5
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 4/18/2007 8:06:41 AM   
lear4406

 

Posts: 1145
Joined: 9/25/2006
Status: offline
Thanks for the comments guys and I will weigh this matter some more. I just don't want to invest more new parts into the 340 if I decide to go with the 440. I also don't want to waste the 6-pak carb set up. I have a friend who will sell me a 70 440 for the GTX. I am putting the GTX back as close to original as possible. The Challenger will be doing street duty. The GTX, the show scene. I have to pull the 340 to put a rear main in, I plan to put new headers and exhaust. That is if I stay with the 340. This would also be a good time to drop the 440 in and add new headers. So that is where I'm at.

_____________________________


(in reply to mopar440)
Post #: 6
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 10/27/2007 9:14:17 PM   
AmericanMuscleCarRev

 

Posts: 45
Joined: 10/26/2007
Status: offline
Lear, Let's not forget that swapping a 440 into the spot where the 340 was isn't a slam dunk.

1st things first, you'll have to get another transmission if it's auto or at least a bell if it's 4 speed.

what about suspension? do you have sway bars? what size are your torsion bars? disc brakes?

Do you want it to handle the same? Stop the same? Not for free...

The 340 will rev, the 440 will torque, what gears do you have in the rear?

Do you already have a 26 inch radiator?

On and on and on.

What's the REAL cost of a swap?


Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Your car Restored for $39 per hour! We Know These Cars Inside and Out!

(in reply to lear4406)
Post #: 7
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 10/28/2007 5:46:35 AM   
lear4406

 

Posts: 1145
Joined: 9/25/2006
Status: offline
AmericanMuscleCarRev thanks for the reply. I have decided for now to freshen up the 340 and add a new cam kit and new headers. Also new radiator and intake and carb. A milodon 7quart pan and a mild port and polish on the stock heads. The car is stripped at the body shop and the engine and trans have been pulled. My brother works at an auto machine shop and he will do all the machine work. The engine only had 21,000 miles on it since a total rebuild in 86. I have the 1" rear sway bar and 1 1/4" for the front. The rear gears are 3:91 and a Kiesler 5-speed will be going in. I'm hoping for over 300 HP at the wheels and I don't see any problem with that goal. The brakes have been upgraded front and back. The car will be a cruiser and driven alot weather permitting But this does leave me with a spare 440 and I don't think thats a bad thing. I'll more than likely just clean it up and put it on an engine stand just for looks.

_____________________________


(in reply to AmericanMuscleCarRev)
Post #: 8
RE: 340 or 440-6 - 10/30/2007 4:29:51 PM   
AmericanMuscleCarRev

 

Posts: 45
Joined: 10/26/2007
Status: offline
You can never have too much Mopar stuff around.

You might be passing by a farm house one day cruising and spot another Challenger that begs for that 440.

I hope so anyway.

Good Luck!


Thumbnail Image


Attachment (1)

_____________________________

Your car Restored for $39 per hour! We Know These Cars Inside and Out!

(in reply to lear4406)
Post #: 9
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]



Today's Posts 
Most Active Topics 
Make A Donation 
Forum Rules 
Forum FAQ 

Featured Vendors

Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
jeremiah 29:4325
rlsh7003855
mopar2ya2684
paladin062371
1 bad mirada2318
roswellgrey1974
dskippy1410
andre@edge1316
rubberbndman1270
lear44061145

Newest Vendors
Borla Performance industries
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology


Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Dodge Challenger Forums
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.2 SP3

DodgeChallenger.com is not in any way related to Daimler Chrysler.