RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane?

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Challenger Vehicle Modification] >> Engine >> RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 10/2/2008 7:03:18 PM   
trev

 

Posts: 203
Joined: 6/11/2008
Status: offline
pretty sure te srt8 was tested with 92 maybe i''m wrong?

carbon on the "and others say it burns away faster. "
the whole point of higher octane is that is burns slower.

the higher the octane rating the more heat or compression is needed to create combustion

more even burn across the face of the piston.

_____________________________


quote:

ORIGINAL: Andre@Edge
What kind of sports car are you getting when all you can say is it was cheaper then the rest?
[/

(in reply to Carbon)
Post #: 11
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 12/10/2008 9:27:14 PM   
whylee

 

Posts: 24
Joined: 12/7/2008
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Carbon

I''''m running 89 in my R/T and you could put 87, but you shouldn''''t put 91 in the 5.7







I thought the six speed R/T was supposed to run premium fuel, which would be 91 octane.

(in reply to Carbon)
Post #: 12
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 12/11/2008 4:11:48 AM   
tskatz


Posts: 94
Joined: 11/6/2008
Status: offline
The little read document called the owners manual say''s that 91 octane is recomended for the six speed cars. The owners manual recomends 89 for the automatic.

_____________________________


(in reply to whylee)
Post #: 13
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 12/11/2008 5:19:48 AM   
epegasus


Posts: 124
Joined: 12/2/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: sabby2000

so they say it requires 89 octane? is this correct?(I have not taken delivery on my R/T yet) anyone out there run 87??? any issues? anyone tried 87/89/super? can you tell any difference? or is this just for overall engine health?(lol)


Engine knock is actually called premature detonation. The fuel mixture explodes in the cylinder as the result of a couple of things; pressure increases as the piston moves upward; and/or hot spots in the cylinder that cause 2 flame fronts that bang into each other. The problem is that the spark is timed to happen as the piston starts it''s downward stroke. When the mix explodes early the piston cap is jammed against the connecting rod & crank which are still moving upward. BAD Juju and it wastes power trying to force a piston down when it can only move up. It can also kill valves and rings. So the purpose of higher octane levels is to raise the fuel mixture''s resistance to detonation under pressure so that it waits for the spark timing.

The ECM can compensate for knocking caused by hot spots by retarding the spark so that the flame fronts don''t collide but you still have a pre-detonation problem that will waste gas and hurt parts so don''t rely on the knock sensor and ECM to compensate for using the wrong octane. Hot spot predetonation can be caused by using spark plugs that are too hot or by carbon build-up that super heats and acts like a second spark plug.

A lot of people think higher octanes burn faster but that is not necessarily true. The speed of the flame front may be the same as lower octane but the pressure at which the fuel explodes is higher.

_____________________________

Can you HEMI?! I say, CAN YOU HEMI, SON?? (c)


(in reply to sabby2000)
Post #: 14
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 12/11/2008 1:46:15 PM   
lear4406

 

Posts: 1182
Joined: 9/25/2006
Status: offline
Due to the combustion chamber in the 6.1 and the 5.7 they are ignited with 2 spark plugs per cylinder to allow flame travel on both sides of the raised piston. This is a big help in even flame travel. You get a complete burn and with it better gas mileage.

_____________________________


(in reply to epegasus)
Post #: 15
RE: does it REALLY need 89 octane? - 12/11/2008 5:17:41 PM   
mopar2ya


Posts: 2854
Joined: 4/9/2007
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: epegasus

Engine knock is actually called premature detonation. The fuel mixture explodes in the cylinder as the result of a couple of things; pressure increases as the piston moves upward; and/or hot spots in the cylinder that cause 2 flame fronts that bang into each other. The problem is that the spark is timed to happen as the piston starts it''''s downward stroke. When the mix explodes early the piston cap is jammed against the connecting rod & crank which are still moving upward. BAD Juju and it wastes power trying to force a piston down when it can only move up. It can also kill valves and rings. So the purpose of higher octane levels is to raise the fuel mixture''''s resistance to detonation under pressure so that it waits for the spark timing.

The ECM can compensate for knocking caused by hot spots by retarding the spark so that the flame fronts don''''t collide but you still have a pre-detonation problem that will waste gas and hurt parts so don''''t rely on the knock sensor and ECM to compensate for using the wrong octane. Hot spot predetonation can be caused by using spark plugs that are too hot or by carbon build-up that super heats and acts like a second spark plug.

A lot of people think higher octanes burn faster but that is not necessarily true. The speed of the flame front may be the same as lower octane but the pressure at which the fuel explodes is higher.


Very nice job explaining epegasus...

_____________________________

04 Neon SXT - Cobalt Blue
92 FXRS-SP Lowrider Sport (his)
03 PT Cruiser - Deep Cranberry
92 XLCH 1200 Sportster (hers)
87 Jeep Comanche 4x4
2008 Challenger SRT8, Got It! Black #2936

(in reply to epegasus)
Post #: 16
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]



Today's Posts 
Most Active Topics 
Make A Donation 
Forum Rules 
Forum FAQ 

Featured Vendors

Advertising Info

Poll
Now that you've seen the 2008 Dodge Challenger SRT-8, what do you think?
I Love It, Its Perfect
I love the looks, but hate the transmission
I like it, but I want the concept interior
I like it, but I want the exact concept exterior
Its ok, but the concept was far better
Thanks, but I look forward to some changes on the 2009 models.

Poll Results
Previous Polls

Top 10 Posters
jeremiah 29:4346
rlsh7003916
mopar2ya2854
paladin062517
1 bad mirada2321
roswellgrey2281
dskippy1411
andre@edge1340
rubberbndman1295
lear44061182

Newest Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
22s.com LLC
Borla Performance industries


Contact Us | Advertising | Partners | Legal | Privacy Policy | © Dodge Challenger Forums
Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.4.2 SP3

DodgeChallenger.com is not in any way related to Daimler Chrysler.